Is this site a treatment provider?
No. Ibogaine vs Iboga is an independent information resource and not a clinic or licensed provider; content is informational only.
About
Ibogaine vs Iboga is an independent information resource on ibogaine for people researching ibogaine. Our mission is to collect evidence, explain safety considerations, and describe how information is organized so readers can find trustworthy, clearly sourced material.
Our editorial approach
We curate and summarise publicly available registries, peer‑reviewed literature, and official guidance rather than offering clinical recommendations. Where readers need clinical or legal advice, we point them toward qualified sources; our pages include inline links to authoritative documents and registries when we cite a specific guideline or statistic.
For example, when discussing editorial standards we reference broadly accepted research reporting principles such as those on Wikipedia's general policy pages for sourcing in order to illustrate standards for verifiability, and we consult major institutional guidance such as pages from national health agencies for procedure and transparency—these sources help us check factual claims in our posts.
What we cover
Our site organizes material into concise topical pages and deeper overview articles. Content focuses on evidence, safety, legality and practical questions that matter to people researching ibogaine. Navigation is structured so a reader can move from high‑level summaries to specific pages — for example, our Services overview explains the types of editorial help and public resources we link to, and it is written to guide readers toward relevant material on the site.
To move between topical areas, readers can follow internal context links embedded in prose; for instance our pages link back to the main overview at the root so users can return to the primary landing descriptions without losing context.
How information is sourced and vetted
We prioritise primary sources and peer‑reviewed research where available, supplementing with registry summaries and official guidance from public health authorities. Claims are checked against original research reports and, when relevant, government or academic resources to reduce misinterpretation.
Where a topic requires specialized registries or treatment‑level data, we draw on primary registries and reputable databases; when we link to external resources we aim to use canonical pages such as Wikipedia for general context (scientific method overview) and institutional guidance like the U.S. National Library of Medicine for procedural context (National Library of Medicine).
